Learn More: Subsidized Housing
Housing Choice Vouchers: The number of housing units being subsidized by HUD's Housing Choice Voucher program
Low Income Housing Tax Credits: The number of housing units subsidized by Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC)
Other Project-Based Programs: The number of housing units being subsidized by the Moderate Rehabilitation, Project-Based Section 8 (including Loan Management Set-Aside, Section 202/8, and Property Disposition), Rent Supplement/Rental Assistance, Section 236/Below Market Interest Rate, Section 202 Capital Advance, or Section 811 Capital Advance programs
Public Housing: The number of public housing units in a given area
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
All Variables available for 2012 - 2015
Housing Choice Vouchers, Other Project-Based Programs & Public Housing also available for 2016 - 2017
Why are theseVariables Important to Measure?
Housing Choice Vouchers
Started in 1974, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)'s Housing Choice Voucher Program provides housing vouchers to low-income families, and elderly and disabled people to help them afford housing by paying for private market housing units. Participants must meet certain income requirements and pay a portion of their income towards rent. The government voucher pays the remaining portion.
Housing choice vouchers are an example of a place-based subsidized housing policy because they allow residents to choose their housing at any location in the private market instead of requiring them to live in a specific public housing development. Place-based subsidies have been an important initiative to decentralize urban poverty sometimes associated with public housing developments. Historically, neighborhoods with high concentrations of public housing developments have experienced economic isolation, poverty, crime and disinvestment. Because housing choice vouchers allow low-income households to find subsidized housing in a neighborhood of their choosing instead of limiting them to public housing developments, the logic behind the program is that families and individuals can potentially move to areas with better opportunities and quality of life.
Low Income Housing Tax Credits
Enacted under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Program is the largest source of subsidized construction for low-income housing in U.S. history. The program provides dollar-for-dollar tax credits to owners and developers of properties, who then lease a certain portion of their units to low-income households at reduced rent prices. Owners are able to rent the remaining portion of the units at market-rate rent prices, often leading to mixed-income housing developments.
The LIHTC has been an important program to increase the construction of affordable housing. It aims to reduce concentrated poverty in government-subsidized housing, since LIHTC properties are located throughout high, middle and low-income neighborhoods. LIHTC developments have been criticized for lowering surrounding neighborhood property values and contributing to higher crime rates, but the evidence for these claims is mixed. In higher-income areas, there is often a backlash against subsidized housing construction, as differences in socioeconomic and racial characteristics between current residents and subsidized housing tenants are perceived to destabilize neighborhoods.
Other Project-Based Programs
Other project-based programs included in this category include Moderate Rehabilitation, Project-Based Section 8 (including Loan Management Set-Aside, Section 202/8, and Property Disposition), Rent Supplement/Rental Assistance, Section 236/Below Market Interest Rate, Section 202 Capital Advance, or Section 811 Capital Advance programs.
In project-based programs, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) creates contracts with specific owners of multifamily rental housing. The project-based rental assistance makes up the difference between what low-income households can afford and the approved rent. There are a number of project-based programs that are geared towards different populations such as people with disabilities or veterans, but the most heavily used program is the Section 8 Project-Based Rental Assistance. Over 1.2 million low-income households use the Section 8 program annually. Project-based programs differ from place-based programs (like Housing Choice Vouchers) because tenants must rent from the approved owners and are not free to choose housing from any location.
Public housing units are owned and managed by government housing authorities and are designed to provide safe and affordable housing to low-income families, and elderly and disabled people. Usually, public housing units are concentrated within a small geographic area.
Public housing originated under the Housing Act of 1937 to create housing for low-income people. Since then, the public housing program has faced controversy, as neighborhoods with high concentrations of public housing units tend to have higher rates of crime, poverty, economic isolation, and racial segregation. Although Congress has appropriated less funds towards public housing in favor of other subsidized housing policies in recent years, millions of people still reside in public housing units across the country.
"Housing choice vouchers fact sheet." U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 7 March 2018. Link
"HUD's public housing program." U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 7 March 2018. Link
"Policy Basics: Section 8 Project-Based Rental Assistance." Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 7 March 2018. Link
"Renewal of Section 8 Project-Based Rental Assistance" U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 7 March 2018. Link
Turner, Margery Austin. "Moving out of poverty: Expanding mobility and choice through tenant-based housing assistance." Housing Policy Debate, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 373-394. Link
Woo, Ayoung, Kenneth Joh, and Shannon Van Zandt. "Impacts of the low-income housing tax cr4edit program on neighborhood housing turnover." Urban Affairs Review, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 247-279, 2016. Link